Replies

It’s all just nasty name-calling with you, isn’t it? No regard for truth. No regard for common decency. Just one unsubstantiated claim after another. You’ve seen the COLB. You’ve seen the long-form birth certificate. You’ve seen several confirmations from the state of Hawaii. After several years now, no credible or legal challenge has been made to these documents. Does that really mean nothing to you? You’re effectively calling the officials who’ve issued these documents a bunch of liars! I just don’t see how that jibes with a conservative Christian mindset.

Yes, you're definitely an Obot Troll. Conservatives are of two minds about this. Those that very much believe there are serious problems with what we've been told, and those that simply do not care about the issue. There are none vehemently supporting Obama's legitimacy.

As for the Long Form, it has been demonstrated six ways from Sunday to be a fabrication, and so far as Hawaii telling the Truth about birth certificates is concerned, no state tells the truth about Birth Certificates regarding AN ADOPTED CHILD.

There are seven pieces of circumstantial evidence that demonstrate Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro in 1965, and when Obama came back to Hawaii in 1968 or 1969 to live with his grandparents, some sort of legal guardianship status had to be worked out for him.

A lot of people believe that 1971 visit by Barack Sr. from Kenya was to establish custody under Hawaiian law, which he could then sign over to the Dunhams.

The point is, It is not unusual at all for a state to produce a fake birth certificate for a child that has gone through an adoption process.

That's why Obama's released birth certificate has so many obvious flaws. It's the product of government employees who don't really give a crap about the quality of their work.

It was meant to fool children and Schools and such, not stand up to intense scrutiny.