[Texas Fossil]

It is obvious that the author did not take a close look at the photo’s of Hillary’s double on 9/11 presented as being at Chelsea’s appartment.

The woman in those photo’s was NOT Hillary. Period. No further discussion. I personally doubt they were Teresa either.

And the Hillary campaign lied bald face and stated the photo’s (source unknown) were Hillary.

Since then Teresa has tried to back away from this as if the photos were made up before hand on a previous visit. (note clothes were the same.)

It is all more ComDem Lies.

[CivilWarBrewing]

I need more convincing of that, but I AM aware of the bogus 'crowds' at one of Hillary's events where it was made to look larger than it really was and GREEN-SCREENED.

[afraidfortherepublic]

I don’t know if it was a double, or not. But I didn’t think that the clothes fit the same, and the shoes were different. The clothes on the woman with the little girl were rumpled.

[SaxxonWoods]

I don’t agree. That was Hillary.

The truth is very easy to prove one way or the other.

She spoke. Voice print analysis will easily tell the tale.

Simple, easy, inexpensive and the evidence is available in the public record.

WND, the National Enquirer, Breitbart and conservative PACs should be right on this.

[cherry]

I agree....that woman displayed was not the witch....now it could have been some film they had from a previous time when the witch was in better health....

remember, we don't have a honest media...

if they were told to do so, they would run any video and state that it was real.....