Posted on 09/12/2016 12:32:36 PM PDT by Mozilla
They’re liberals.
Trump should tell them they’re fired or he walks.
Mr. Trump did not say they should be done away with because they are deplorable.
Yes. Have him refuse to debate unless he gets the people he wants.
I agree they’re not going to be fair, because they’re not going to happen.
I think he needs to hijack the debate right there on live TV. Announce the format change right there and tell the mods, they get to select the topic Trump and Hillary will debate.
What are they going to do? Cut to commercial?
Lincoln-Douglas - No moderators, six hours outdoors in hot weather, no time limits, no microphones.
That I’d like to see....
You know, this is the era of jobs being done away with by robots. We don’t need those stinking biased MSM hacks. Let people submit questions on Facebook or something and have the candidates answer them. All they need is a college footbal ref with a whistle to make sure Hillary doesn’t try to steal all the time for herself. Or cough on Trump.
“Moderators” are not needed.
9/11 now has a new significance; the hag’s power hungry political career is finished as of 9/11/16. God does work in mysterious ways.
I totally agree. The media is about 500% against Trump.
I would let each camp choose a moderator. That seems fair.
Do away with the “moderators” and bring in UFC referees. That’s the kind of debate I want to see.
Art of the Deal in action: Push for no moderators as his initial position - eventually work toward what he wants, a change of moderators that works in his favor.
Allow a moderator picked by each candidate. They can alternate questions.
I would make sure every newspaper and electronic medium in the country had the list before the debate started. And I would ensure that the moderators agreed to my stipulations or I'd simply refuse to attend, on the grounds that I'm not going to serve as ratings fodder for your network while you destroy my campaign.
I watched the entire Commander in Chief forum last week. I thought Matt Lauer appeared to be trying to save Hillary from herself and her own horrible performance when he interrupted her, told her to answer quickly, and the other things about which her supporters were whining.
In contrast, Lauer was rude and combative and just happened to have a 3-year-old tweet at the ready when interviewing Donald Trump. The difference was Trump spoke right over him and got his message to the audience.
I believe most of the announced debate moderators will behave as Lauer did, and while ardent Trump supporters won’t be swayed by them, I don’t know how the undecideds will see things.
yeah, it has a new significance and now my and others’ recollections and dead friends dont matter /s
what state or planet are you from?
“Trump should tell them they’re fired or he walks.”
Exactly. All they need is a reader—a non-journalist. How did the gerbalists come to monopolize these debates anyway?—reading the same questions addressed to both participants, and s/he keeps time too but otherwise zips it.
And in the wings, a neurologist with a crash cart. No political hacks. Excepting Hildabeast.
With the advancement of Artificial Intelligence and computers that can out-think chess masters, couldn’t computers/robots be programmed to be moderators?
never to discount any significance of the attacks in 2001 and 2012. my implication was that the hag got a degree of pay back on 9/11/2016
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.