Or you could just temporarily revert tp paper ballots, picture ID and voter rolls purging.
You would fight local election officials who would cry and whine that they purchased these expensive machines and they can’t afford all the election workers and managers to go back to paper only.
The problem is those who want these hackable machines will fight in state courts to keep them. They will claim the machines are certified at the source and there is no threat. But that is false, and has been proven false.
The most important fact is the machine can hide what it’s doing. An analogous question is are we willing to hand our ballot to a person behind a curtain who promises to record our vote faithfully? Hell no!
Block-Chain Tech (BCT) can take it across state lines so that a federal law can be passed to require such tech. This is why we should learn and be aware of this tech.
I predict that if Donald Trump wins and in 2017 Americans wake up and cause Congress to pass an election reform law to mandate among other things implementation of Block-Chain Technology, that the democorrupt media with its Uniparty support will spew nonstop stories about how BCT is weak, flawed, hackable, etc. This is why it is important to keep an eye on Australia’s experience.
But even more, BCT has a track record with Bitcoin where it was conceived. Not only that but any technical-minded programmer or engineer can review the principles of BCT and quickly realize it makes great sense.