That is why TURNOUT will be very important for Mr. Trunp and it has to be BIG.
It can be a landslide but you’re still missing the point that Soros has already admitted to. They expect Trump to win the popular vote but lose the EC.
In 2000, 101,455,899 voted for President of which 50,456,002 (47.9%) voted for Bush and 50,999,897 (48.4%) voted for Gore. The percent difference was 0.5%. Very close. Gore barely won the popular vote and as many correctly point out, the FL panhandle quit and went home when it was announced that Gore had won FL. So the popular vote could very well have been much narrower in Gore’s favor or even in Bush’s favor if there were not games by the media networks in calling results prematurely.
In 1980, Ronald Reagan won 43,903,230 votes to Jimmy Carter’s 35,480,115 and John Anderson’s 5,719,850. The landslide by Reagan would have been larger with Anderson out of the race. Of the votes cast for just Reagan and Carter, Reagan got 55.3% and Carter 44.7%.
The 1984 election between Reagan and Mondale was an even bigger blowout landslide in Reagan’s favor.
Now if Donald comes in with Gore-like vote percentages over whoever but he loses the EC (Gore took 266 electoral votes and Bush 271), then we are all going to feel awful and the dems are going to be telling us ‘told ya so’. We won’t be able to do anything about it.
But if Donald comes in with Reagan-like vote percentages over whoever but he loses the EC (Carter took 49 electoral votes and Reagan 489), then we are all going to riot, cause revolution and anarchy.
But because today we have millions of illegals and easily hacked electronic voting machines, hackable by a few corrupted persons over a large region without anyone else knowing, then it’s likely we get our guns loaded.
But I guarantee you the democrats will be touting that everyone needs to follow the rule of law and that a long-term solution is to abolish the EC which will have to be done by Constitutional Amendment.
And they will be very happy to do away with the EC because that means California and New York elect our President, and they would be tickled pink with that result.
So there you have it, the democrats will be nodding their heads that definitely something is very wrong when a nominee wins so much of the popular vote but ends up losing the EC. So therefore, in their minds, we must do away with the EC (which is what they want).
The real long-term solution is to get control of immigration, deport millions of people who are here illegally and who vote, and to build safeguards into our voting system.
But to win this time around without all the above reforms, we will need to challenge wherever, whenever possible every vote and every machine. We may need to get court orders against machines. And when the democrats raise hell for this, we tell them the long-tern solution lies in immigration control and election reforms.