[HarleyLady27]

Because of what today is, the remembrance of so many that died at the hands of terrorists, Saudi Arabia, and others, I will not make fun of what just happened to Hillary, BUT:

We have been saying there is a serious health problem with Hillary, and more than one...I have posted recently things that I have found that suggest there are problems...

It is to late to put someone else on the ballot, ballots are printed for our Military already for them to ‘absentee ballot’ vote, and there are States getting ready within a week or two for ‘absentee ballot’ votes...

This presents problems since Hillary cannot continue in this election...from all that I have read, it's up to the one that had the closest votes during the primary to take her place, but it's up to Congress to decide this, it is NOT up to the President...

In the above information, Bernie Sanders was the closest to her in the party votes, NOT Tim Kaine, and it is up to the DNC to work with the Congress on this...

I do hope that we can observe with respect what today is and remember the lives that were taken, and know that God has His hand in all of this, folks, have faith in God over this matter, He knows what He is doing to help save our Country...

RIP to all those taken 15 years ago, WE WILL NEVER FORGET...

[Captain Peter Blood]

The way it works is this, The DNC and only the DNC can name a replacement for Hillary. It is strictly up to the party. It will not be Bernie. These are the party rules.

[Reily]

Why would the DNC work with Congress?

Political parties are private organizations! Yes I know thanks to dubious (likely unconstitutional!) state laws current political parties are “protected” and have become a quasi-arm of the government. There is UTTERLY NO Constitutional requirement for political parties to work with anyone in FedGov to “vet” candidates for health (or death!) issues health-wise or any other reason.

I am always amazed about how little people understand about the political process. For example there is NO REQUIREMENT for a candidate for any elected federal office to have a “clean enough” background to support a security clearance at any level! If it was so do you actually think we would have Zero? Or Slick Willy ? or now Hellary ? That's the job of the voters in the respective parties. Rats flat out don't care about national security. This is Rat thinking: “National security” is something made up by the “oppressive white, evangelistic Christian male dominated system” to keep women and minorities down!. Those Rats that can't string that many multi-syllable words together just want to stick their snout in the FedGov taxpayer-sourced trough!

Practicing politicians would never stand for it that includes conservatives, GOP-E’ers, Libertarians, any of them ! Because if a security investigation finds something illegal it has to be reported!

[djstex]

Thanks for the ping.