Seriously, is there any reason to jam it?
Hillary has already laid down her positons, so what she says won't be any surprise to anyone.
Trump on the other hand will bring something brand new to the debate and the Hillary camp will strain in a vain attempt to smear him.
Trump's going to walk away in all three debates, and the worse the moderators are, the better he'll do.
Hillary is simply a temporary obstacle in his path which he will kick aside.
There certainly is a reason to jam it. Neither side should have any unfair advantage. She already has 3 liberal debate moderators who will work for her. I would not be surprised if Hillary's people were found to be involved with debate question development/selection. I would also assume that at a minimum the questions will be leaked to her people in advance.
I hope Trump and his people are taking the debates very very seriously. There is a lot at risk and they could swing the election either way. I hope his people are smart enough to train him on how to deal with the usual Democrat tactics. Questions that deal with minute details of certain laws or foreign policy issues must be deflected skillfully otherwise he'll look like an idiot trying to bluff his way through them. I expect the usual array of questions on abortion, LGBT crap, women's issues, and other "soft" issues with limited hard treatment to the economy, real employment data, serious immigration/refugee, the military, etc..