Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
...he asked his supervisors for a religious accommodation to abstain from the training, which was denied.

Now there's a lawsuit that goes straight to the Supreme Court, do not pass go, do not collect $200.

What are the grounds of the denial over trying to force him to experience training literally designed to get him to abandon his religion? This is a direct assault on his 1st Amendment right to religious freedom - bald-faced. Because they can't deny the effect the video intended - it was the reason they demanded he watch it.

18 posted on 09/09/2016 1:22:30 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker

“...he asked his supervisors for a religious accommodation to abstain from the training, which was denied.”

“Now there’s a lawsuit that goes straight to the Supreme Court, do not pass go, do not collect $200.”

Years ago when I was a supervisor, they started advising supervisors to get insurance in case we got sued over something. I got a job that didn’t include any supervisory functions.


67 posted on 09/09/2016 2:50:40 PM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson