That's an OCR that always misses characters. Here is an actual screenshot of the email, it is real:
Posted on 09/08/2016 4:30:43 PM PDT by NoLibZone
My first reaction, too.
But it is on Wikileaks.
Not saying I trust Julian Assange, but he wouldn't fake something so small.
That's an OCR that always misses characters. Here is an actual screenshot of the email, it is real:
Thank you, I was beginning to wonder if it was real.
Libs say it was for the UN, I don’t think she listened to any speeches there that day though.
She spoke at a lunch for Female Heads of State and Foreign Ministers, that seems to be before the email.
AS PREPARED
SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON REMARKS AT CTBT ARTICLE XIV CONFERENCE
NEW YORK, NY
SEPTEMBER 24, 2009
https://www.armscontrol.org/ClintonCTBTStatement
Thanks.
Andd what was her apointment log showing where she was on 9/24. Where was she going to need such prompting?
Which was given before the email was sent :
http://www.ctbto.org/the-treaty/article-xiv-conferences/2009/thursday-24-september-2009-am/
At 11 AM apparently.
Maybe she just meant hairpiece.
She gave a speech and attended the CTBT meeting from 11 AM to 1 PM. That afternoon she gave the speech at the luncheon. At the beginning of the speech she said was was a little late because of the traffic and that she had just come from a meeting at the UN. The email was sent at 1:05 PM, so it was probably referring to this lunch - where she wouldn't need a translation. By the way, at meetings,the UN provides headsets for translation. They are built into the chairs. You can see all of the other delegates wearing them in the meeting where she gave the speech ( after she finishes, they pan the audience ). So, the libs excuse that the headset was for translation is a bunch of bull. Here is the link to the UN page that you can view the speech ( it is in rm format, so you have to view it through something like VLC ):
How the FBI Went Easy on Hillary Clinton
Published September 9, 2016
By Paul Sperry, The New York Post
It’s clear now the FBI conducted a sweetheart investigation into Hillary Clinton’s e-mail shenanigans that appears to have been fixed from the start to go nowhere.
Far from exonerating Clinton, the nearly 60 pages of documents expose both the systematic destruction of subpoenaed evidence by Clinton’s aides and the curious lack of interest by investigators in recovering it.
Agents also failed to resolve unanswered questions, reconcile contradictory testimony or sweat uncooperative witnesses.
Comey declared the investigation free of undue influence three days after his agents interviewed Clinton at FBI headquarters under special terms. Agents weren’t allowed to Mirandize Clinton or place her under oath, even though she was the subject of a criminal investigation possibly involving espionage. They weren’t even allowed to record her answers.
What’s more, Comey made the two FBI agents who interviewed Clinton — along with all agents and forensic analysts involved in the so-called investigation — sign non-disclosure agreements gagging them from talking about the case even with other employees.
Comey even let Clinton’s State Department aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson sit in on the interview with Clinton’s other lawyers, despite the glaring conflict of interest. FBI documents make clear Mills and Samuelson led the effort to search and destroy Clinton’s subpoenaed e-mails and should’ve been prime targets of the investigation.
Comey didn’t even attend her interview and, per his testimony, only read a “summary” of it.
The FBI failed to pursue even the most basic lines of questioning. When Clinton pleaded ignorance about basic classification symbols, agents could’ve produced the State documents she signed acknowledging she was briefed about how to ID and handle classified information at the highest levels.
Read at: http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/09/09/how-fbi-went-easy-hillary-clinton
Also, I don’t think the earpiece was used for the speech at the luncheon. It was a short speech. What I think it was used for was at the photo-ops. She had her picture taken with each of the wives- each sitting across from eachother in armchairs. As the press is taking photos, they are chit chatting. Huma is probably giving her info on each of the wives -where they are from, names of kids if they have any, etc. So the wives feel really important that Hillary knows about their family.
?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.