Posted on 09/08/2016 11:00:49 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
I think he did too, such as her going on about how she even ducked into special tents when reading classified material, to make sure cameras etc could not see it — but the FBI report said she would sit outside in the clear open air on the State Department BALCONY to check her email.
I use a truck, does not mean that I don’t also use a car.
The FBI has already demonstrated that she used a private unsecured server, as you say.
That is the important issue.
To says “I used a secure server.” is a diversion and obfuscation. We’re sure she did when in a setting where it had to be. That doesn’t mean she did not use the server that has been discovered.
Same as my truck. I use it for certain things.
But I also use my car.
The use of "Little Tents" would be news to me. See my Post #25 above for my experience with SCIFs and security systems. I'm sure it is very much like your own.
Clinton changed the subject to “classified system” and “unclassified system” - as distinguished from a secured government system and an unsecured private system - that’s the issue.
She opened up a new can of worms.
You think?
It seems that even the so-called Conservative media is not ready to explore this cluster-f**k that Hillary has opened.
***She just keeps making things up and assumes none of her fans will question her.***
None of her fans will question her. She could shoot someone dead in the street, and her fans will stand by her side.
No argument with most of what you say, but if Hillary “used secure systems to communicate sent classified information” from a secure server, why haven’t redacted versions of any of them been produced in response to subpoenas and court orders under FOIA lawsuits, and subpoenas by Congressional investigative committees (Gowdy and/or Chaffetz)?
The various plaintiffs should be asking this question in court, and the committee chairmen should require her (and whoever is responsible for document production at the DoS) to explain this immediately.
Clinton tells lies to cover for previous lies. That is by design — to obfuscate. Which lie is true and which lie is a lie to cover the truth?
She played the same song and dance with the location(s) of the server —
>> it was at the Cappaqua residence — in the basement, no in the barn
>> it was in New Jersey
>> it was in Manhattan
>> it was in Colorado
And since her friends in the media (many of whom just happen to be current or previous members of the Clinton Foundation) likely will not ask, so as not to challenge her, she skates again. She thinks she is being even more clever with the lies, parsing, nuances than even ole BJ was.
This has been the 30 years of the Clintons, scandals, lies, deny, scandals, lies, deny...over and over again...
I don’t know how anyone else feels but after living with this mess for 30 years, I’m so sick of the two of them...Bill and his sex; and lies; and drugs; Hillary and her Saul Alinsky, Black Panthers, ‘It takes a Villiage’ crap; First Lady of Arkansas crap; First Lady of America, what a total disgrace, her ‘carpetbagging’ of Senator of New York, did she have JFK jr. done away with so she could have that seat? We probably will never know...her S of S crap...whitewater, Benghazi, emails, Cattle futures, talking with Elanor Roosevelt, travelgate, chinagate, uranium to Russia, the College Bill took 16 million dollars for, and it just keeps going and going and going...
When can we put an end to this? How about on Nov 8th, lets rid America of the two mafia fiends like Rudy did to the Mafia in New York!!!
Thanks, my understanding was that she had no secure .gov accounts.
She doesn’t remember her lies.
Reminds me of calling in sick because your grandmother died. Five times.
The two subjects the FBI still can’t find is e-mails pertaining to yoga lessons and Chelsea’s wedding.
The rumors of the liar having Parkisons or brain damage is all over the news. So why hasn’t the liar come out on TV and said “ I do not have Parkinsons disease nor do I have brain damage”.
There would always have been access to a secure system. She chose not to use it.
“I communicated about classified material on a wholly separate system.”
...as well as on unclassified systems.
Artfully misleading. Her sometimes use of secure methods, is unrelated to those instances when she did not - except that it demonstrates that she knew the way it was supposed to have been done.
I’m pretty sure Jusicial Watch will get right on it. They’ve been pretty good about follow up. Problem is by the time they get the info it’ll probably be too late.
So much lie here:
1. A SCIF is a SCIF because - among other things - it's hardened against the emission of electromagnetic radiation... the kind that all electronic devices emit. A "tent" would stop nothing and would not be suitable for such protection for any purpose excepting line of sight.
2. Now suddenly she says she recognizes classified markings? Oh, that's good. Last week, she had no idea what "(C)" meant.
3. Nobody moves classified documents or materials around in the outdoors unless under exceptional circumstances... like wartime. Certainly not the State Department. If you're at a meeting or ceremony or other such thing, you typically wait until you get back to the protection of an embassy or official office.
Oh by the way - if such tents were to exist, she just made them a target.
Wikileaks is our only hope to expose more of this pre election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
