“unanimous decision of the USSC should have ended the matter”
No. All the USSC said was that jury instructions were incorrect. They did not preclude retrial. There is nothing legally improper about his retrial. That’s the wrong tree to bark up. Find another one if you must
The issue of whether there is nothing legally improper about his retrial is besides the point. The point clearly is that this is a political persecution by Democrats. Its their modus operandi. Its what they do. Can you honestly see this same scenario happening to a Democrat politician?