Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant

Vetting of the moderators would seem to be appropriate. Which party are they registered with, what is their past record of bias when their words are run through a checking system, have they donated to the Clinton foundation, etc.

Would love to see Trump say, “You reporters asked us to ‘raise our hands’ in one debate, so I want to ask you all to raise your hands if you are registered as a Democrat or if you are planning to vote for Clinton.”

It gets old seeing these dunces act so high and mighty and like they just know better about everything in the world than anybody else. They are almost all really shallow and rather dimwitted, oh and boring too.


76 posted on 09/02/2016 10:52:17 AM PDT by Anima Mundi (Envy is just passive, lazy greed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Anima Mundi

I would leave the moderators in place, but make a few changes.

1. Both candidates must stand and there is no podium to stand behind.
2. The only handshake takes place at the end of the debate.
3. The moderator can only ask topical questions which are applied to both candidates. The mod cannot ask probing questions.
4.Any inkling of partisanship will result in a 10 year suspension to both the network and moderator from hosting any further debates.
5. There will be no network commentary on the debate either before or after the debate.


77 posted on 09/02/2016 11:08:21 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (It appears as if Trump is our Yeltsin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson