Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impala64ssa; All
"Opponents point out that, according to FAA classifications, drones are technical aircraft and interfering with the flight of one is a federal crime. So far no shooters have been prosecuted on the federal level."

While I agree with the mission of the FAA in principle, patriots need to learn to question all actions of the corrupt federal government by first checking the Constitution to see if the states have expressly delegated to the feds the specific power to justify an action.

And in the case of the FAA, not only have the states never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution the specific power to regulate drones, but neither have the states delegated to the feds the specific power to establish the FAA.

In other words, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson had warned patriots about the corrupt federal government wrongly expanding its powers, little by little, outside the framework of the Constitution.

In the case of the FAA, it is a good example of expansion of federal powers without the required consent of the Constitution’s Article V state majority imo.

Note that it has long been impossible to reverse-engineer what the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers are based on its actions.

Wake up patriots !

The clock is ticking.

50 posted on 09/01/2016 10:58:33 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Amendment10

“Wake up patriots ! The clock is ticking.”

Airliners flying across the US should have to deal with 15 different FAA’s as they do so? Clearly you aren’t in the aviation business. Also, you might not be a constitutional scholar. Southwest airlines based in Dallas, taking off for Denver for commercial purposes, is very clearly engaging in interstate commerce. There is a constitutional clause about that that kind of thing you might find interesting.

The FAA, cant believe I would ever go to bat for _them_. But yeah, they aren’t unconstitutional as a concept, and no, the existence of an FAA is not exactly a “patriots arise” moment.


61 posted on 09/01/2016 11:16:14 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Amendment10

FAA falls nicely under the Commerce Clause.

Post Roads may actually be better. (The original air routes were actually air mail routes, and a lot of mail still goes by plane.)

http://sometimes-interesting.com/2013/12/04/concrete-arrows-and-the-u-s-airmail-beacon-system/. (The original air routes were actually air mail routes, and a lot of mail still goes by plane.)


107 posted on 09/01/2016 12:29:19 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson