Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The KG9 Kid

I’m not so sure.
1. The 30mm is a HUGE mount. I don’t see it being anything other than an electro-mechanical T&E mechanism. That places an additional electrical and maintenance burden on the vehicle and weapons system.
2. The rounds are 2-3 times the size of .50cal. That means MUCH less ammo.


25 posted on 08/31/2016 5:03:44 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: SJSAMPLE

Not only that, but the 30mm barrel has a tendency to overheat and comes with a burst limiter, which is usually set to 10 or 20 round bursts in the Apache. Not exactly a good thing in the heat of ground combat.


26 posted on 08/31/2016 5:10:15 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Vote Trump. Defeat the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Reset America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: SJSAMPLE
1. The 30mm is a HUGE mount. I don’t see it being anything other than an electro-mechanical T&E mechanism. That places an additional electrical and maintenance burden on the vehicle and weapons system.

2. The rounds are 2-3 times the size of .50cal. That means MUCH less ammo.

That was my thought, too. About 5 years ago I was working on a Navy contract mounting 30 and 40mm guns on Blackhawks. It put a large amount of stress on the mounts and frames.

The bigger gun isn't much of an advantage if you can only carry 200 rounds of ammo.

31 posted on 08/31/2016 6:16:22 AM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson