Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jcon40

imho the steady militarization of China looks strikingly like what happened in Japan where they had 30 years of industrial growth at the turn of the 20th century. On a percentage basis it was far higher than Britian or America. That growth was similiar to that of Germany.

What the Japanese did was to shift their spending to the military to try to secure their growth. There was a struggle for power between the military and the civilian parts of the Japanese government. The military won.

What’s happening now is that the chinese military is gaining more power over foreign policy—while the Chinese factional system is dwindling. That means the longer Xi stays in power —the more the party’s power will shrink and the stronger will be the military.

If the Chinese get into a military confrontation and win —the power of the military will increase—relative to the party. If they get into a military confrontation and lose—the power of the party will decrease (and the military).

So essentially all military action for China is a lose lose proposition for the party.

But even if there is no military action and Xi rules for the next 15 years—or until he is 80—he will still retire with a shrunken CPC and an enlarged PLAN — so the relative power of the two institutions will have shifted in favor of PLAN and therefor war.


6 posted on 08/31/2016 7:27:05 AM PDT by ckilmer (q e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ckilmer

Reminds me of what was said about Japan after the war.

Everything we gave them before the war .... Raw materials, economic growth ...we got back in the way of bombs.


7 posted on 08/31/2016 8:15:17 AM PDT by jcon40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson