Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper

Actually, he didn’t. He totally ignored the connection with CGI at all, and he made light of the product’s exorbitant cost to families by saying they could cancel their cable subscriptions in order to afford it. He’s a never-Trump member and has shown his true colors again...that he supports Hillary and is no friend to conservatives.


13 posted on 08/26/2016 1:42:39 AM PDT by Prince of Space (Be Breitbart, baby. LIFB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Prince of Space

Not only that, but the whole “creative, inventive, R&D cost” argument doesn’t even apply in this case. Mylan didn’t invent the EpiPen, they purchased the patents for it. So the cogent and relevant argument would be to compare the revenue they are making from EpiPen sales to the cost of acquiring those rights. Had he done his homework, or had any interest in the actual costs involved in producing this life-saving device, he would report that the actual manufacturing cost of epinephrine is only $1 per dose or what the auto-injector device actually costs. The fact that competitors can produce it and sell at a profit for $100 while Mylan is charging $600 is also missing from the story.

Of course, that would not feed the narrative that “a child’s life is worth any price”. That attitude is the root of the hyperbolic inflation in healthcare costs. It seems like every life saving treatment now requires you sign away your expected earnings for the rest of that life. It is legalized price gouging. It is also extortion, with government forcing you to buy insurance to cover procedures but sticking you with a deductible or co-pay amount higher than a free market would place on the service without insurance.

It is articles like this that make Republicans look bad — like we are all greedy jerks always taking the side of big business no matter how outrageous their behavior. I suspect in this case it is intentional, and part of the never-Trump movement to throw away the election.


14 posted on 08/26/2016 2:25:12 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Prince of Space

And he “works” at a magazine that largely derives its source of funding from foundations. Much like NPR.


15 posted on 08/26/2016 2:39:26 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Rest In Peace MeekMom (1966-2016))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Prince of Space

I think he made an excellent case that politicians have not cured or created anything in the medical field. And he made some very appropriate observations regarding the hypocrisy of Bernie and Hillary.

Why do you think he is pro-Clinton?


19 posted on 08/26/2016 3:46:16 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson