Seriously?
The author quoted a number of times from the actual report, if you bothered to read the piece. Besides that, he used additional sources:
Attorney Elizabeth Yore, who served on the Heartland Institute Delegation that traveled to the Vatican in April 2015 to urge Pope Francis to re-examine his reliance on UN population control proponents who promote climate change, spoke to LifeSiteNews about the Soros initiative. “Catholics serve as a huge and influential voting block in the U.S. election,” she said. Soros, she said, is “using the head of the Catholic Church to influence this key voting block,” with the “bully pulpit of the papacy” to ensure Hilary Clinton’s election.
And this from the Daily Caller:
The Soros document goes on to state: “By harnessing the Papal visit to lift up the Pope’s searing critique of what he calls ‘an economy of exclusion and inequality’ and his dismissal of ‘trickle down’ theories, PICO and FPL will work to build a bridge to a larger conversation about bread-and-butter economic concerns and shift national paradigms and priorities in the run-up to the 2016 presidential campaign.”
Reread the title of this piece, in case you missed it: "Leaked e-mails show George Soros paid $650K to influence bishops during Pope’s US visit"
That was Soro’s intent...does not mean he succeeded and there was no evidence in what I read showing he succeeded. the author presumed guilt from actions by bishops who were acting in normal fashion with the Catholic faith. Supporting growth of Christian communities, helping the poor, etc.
Not arguing in defense of Soros...defending the Catholic faith and those who serve within.