Posted on 08/23/2016 3:08:28 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
OAKLAND (KPIX 5) Scores of California students may be sent home on their first day of school because of a new vaccine law that took effect this year. The new state law took effect July 1. Now, parents can no longer use personal or religious beliefs as a reason not to have their kids immunized. This school year, kindergartners and seventh graders must show proof of immunizations.
Monday WAS the first day of school for kids in Oakland. Hundreds of them were expected to be sent home.
"There could be a few hundred kids that are not immunized and so we'll be encouraging them as quickly as possible to get out there," said Oakland Unified School District John Sasaki. "Their parents may try to drop them off and we'll have to turn them away."
Young children who got their personal belief exemptions approved before January 2016, will be grandfathered in. According to the new law, they still must get immunized when they reach seventh grade...
(Excerpt) Read more at sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com ...
This new California Law is the first of what I believe to be many coercive government laws coming our way. It is truly sad and pathetic to see families, who have received vaccinations, not confident in their vaccinations. The truth is that no man-made effort is a silver bullet against disease. Only God Himself can truly heal the sick and protect us from disease. The same God the gave our grandparents, great grandparents, great great grandparents, all the way back to Adam and Eve protection and healing from disease can do so today. But what if the Government forces everyone, without exception, to receive vaccinations? Is faith in God illegal now? What if vaccinations are made with aborted fetal tissue? What if Obama's Science (vaccination) Czar is committed to reducing the American population by 90% (John Holdren) using forced abortions and vaccination sterilization?
Perhaps God is calling his people out of this system that teaches kids that good is evil and evil is good, boys are girls and girls are boys, Islam is good religion and Christianity is evil, white people are guilty and black people are entitled victims, personal responsibility is bad and collectivism is good...
Revelation 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/21/obamas-science-czar-considered-forced-abortions-sterilization-population-growth.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/aborted-fetuses-vaccines/story?id=29005539
So you design a ‘professional’ looking forum on your computer, sign a phony Doctors name (remember, make it illegible!) and then, using a checker and a stamp pad, emboss it with an official looking seal.
Problem solved.
Which vaccinations are they mandating?
I would bet the HPV vaccine is one of them. Our “educators” expect kids to be having sex, so they groom them for such.
HPV is not given to those 7 and younger so that won’t be true
"This school year, kindergartners and seventh graders must show proof of immunizations."
It could apply to seventh graders, most certainly.
I guess I could ask why Christians would be sending their kids to the hell holes in the first place...but that might get people angry.
No HPV, the mandatory vaccines are: diphtheria, hepatitis B, hemophilus influenzae type b (commonly referred to as Hib), measles, mumps, pertussis, poliomyelitis, rubella, tetanus and varicella
Pharma-Med-Gov syndicate fears gradual acknowledgement that the US childhood vaccination schedule is recklessly agressive. 48 doses of 16 different vaccines are administered to a child by age 6.
Some combine FIVE different vaccines in one shot!
Other peer first world nations have adopted a far more conservative vaccination schedule to reduce incidents of vaccine injury.
US National Institute of Health study confirms:
A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination uptake across the U.S. population. - PubMed - NCBI
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535
Toxicol Environ Health A. 2011;74(14):903-16. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2011.573736.
A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination uptake across the U.S. population.
Delong G1.
Author information
Abstract
The reason for the rapid rise of autism in the United States that began in the 1990s is a mystery. Although individuals probably have a genetic predisposition to develop autism, researchers suspect that one or more environmental triggers are also needed. One of those triggers might be the battery of vaccinations that young children receive. Using regression analysis and controlling for family income and ethnicity, the relationship between the proportion of children who received the recommended vaccines by age 2 years and the prevalence of autism (AUT) or speech or language impairment (SLI) in each U.S. state from 2001 and 2007 was determined. A positive and statistically significant relationship was found: The higher the proportion of children receiving recommended vaccinations, the higher was the prevalence of AUT or SLI. A 1% increase in vaccination was associated with an additional 680 children having AUT or SLI. Neither parental behavior nor access to care affected the results, since vaccination proportions were not significantly related (statistically) to any other disability or to the number of pediatricians in a U.S. state. The results suggest that although mercury has been removed from many vaccines, other culprits may link vaccines to autism. Further study into the relationship between vaccines and autism is warranted.
PMID:
21623535
DOI:
10.1080/15287394.2011.573736
When I was in 3rd grade in the 50s, I remember the school closing because of an outbreak of polio. Several weeks later they opened the schools again. 5 or 6 kids in the school did not return. One died and the others could no longer walk suffering from infantile paralysis. That’s a lot of reality for a third grader to absorb. Two or three years later they had the Salk vaccine and we lined up gladly to receive it.
People mow fear the vaccine. The diseases they prevent are far worse.
Jan and others,
Isn’t incredible that fruit n flakes California is Soooo concerned about protecting the liberties of illegal immigrants, sodomites, and aborting babies?
Yet CA cares not a damn about your rights as a parent to determine the health care of your child, or the actual right of a baby to be born and live.
Eff’ed up authoritarian state if there ever was.
Exactly, get ready for the pro-vaxers in, three, two, one, last Vaccine I received was in 1969 when I joined the Marines,..64 tomorrow and I have been to a doctor 10 times in 64 years heh heh..
POOF! The sound of another lost liberty.
The short, eye-opening eBook linked below is titled Aluminum in Vaccines — a Neurological Gamble, by Neil Miller, director of the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute. It documents the hazards associated with aluminum-laden vaccines. Children are receiving high concentrations of aluminum in their shots. This well-documented neurotoxin may be more dangerous than mercury.
Vaccines containing high concentrations of neurotoxic aluminum were added to the child immunization schedule when several vaccines containing mercury were removed. Two-month old babies now receive 1,225 mcg of aluminum from their vaccines — 50 times higher than safety levels! Although the FDA, CDC and World Health Organization are aware of the dangers, they expect parents to play Russian roulette with their children.
You must not have read my post.
What about injecting children with aborted fetal tissue?
Funny you should say that :-) I remember getting ten vaccines in one month in the mid 60s when I was in 7th grade, because the family was moving to Japan and the USN required it of all dependents; most were for diseases that hadn’t shown up in Japan since the Occupation or before (like yellow fever), but I seem to have survived.
OTOH, my daughter just turned 20 and she didn’t get the HPV vaccine, by parental choice. She did get all the other usual ones, and thereby missed out on my first grade experience of having measles, then mumps, then chicken pox, in rapid succession; the measles made the eyes myopic, have been wearing glasses ever since.
Just like in the beginning of the Christian Faith, In the end, the choice will not be “God or Satan”, or “Heaven or Hell”. It will be “Faith in Jesus or Faith in Ceasar”. That is what the Mark of the Beast is about. Forced vaccinations are a step towards the Mark. Not to mention, they are made from aborted babies.
Some combine FIVE different vaccines in one shot!
Five vaccines combined in a single shot is a drop in the bucket when compared to the thousands of live microorganisms that a child encounters and against which the child's immune system mobilizes every single day. Furthermore, there is no chance that the vaccines will cause a disease--unlike the thousands of microorganisms the child encounters daily, many of which can cause very serious, even fatal, disease.
A positive association found between autism prevalence and childhood vaccination uptake across the U.S. population.
Unfortunately, only the abstract is available on PubMed. That said, all the abstract says is that there is a statistical correlation. That is extremely weak, and does not prove anything. Statistical correlations can be found between many sets of unrelated data, even when using the most stringent statistical methods. At the level of statistical significance that most researchers use, P < 0.05, one out of twenty statistical correlations is completely spurious. Furthermore, when someone is looking to associate two sets of data, they can play around with all kinds of parameters to eventually come up with a statistical correlation when more stringent methods don't show one.
In the most robust research, researchers devise carefully controlled experiments, designed to test every possibility, and only after they get results do they then apply the statistical analyses in order to validate the results. In good research, a statistical test is not used in lieu of actually doing studies. The author of that abstract is trying to promote a statistical correlation as the equivalent of careful study. I'm not surprised he has no co-authors--no self-respecting scientist would want their name connected to what is essentially garbage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.