Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1

Nonsense. The general purpose of bail is to assure the suspect returns to court for his/her trial. The greater their wealth, the greater the cost of fleeing the court’s order to appear. The less likely the chance of disobeying, the lower the cost. The more questionable the charges, the less the probability of not returning, hence the lower the bail. If you’re too poor to pay the bondsman, the room and board is free. Maybe that’s too simple, but it has worked for a long time.


32 posted on 08/20/2016 7:44:20 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: imardmd1
“You can't arrest me. I'm dead.” - Susquehanna Hat scene from Abbot and Costello.
33 posted on 08/20/2016 7:47:54 PM PDT by MGG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: imardmd1

I am torn about this. What about a poor working person making minimum wage gets accused of a crime who can’t afford bail amount. Sits in jail, loses their job, then they find out via trial, person didn’t commit the crime.

If convicted of major crime like murder then no, there should be cash bond amount.

If minor crimes, I would be in favor of ankle tracking bracelets.


80 posted on 08/21/2016 7:03:46 AM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson