Lighten up, Francis.
There you go again, NB, losing focus on gthe big picture. Your snotty and hysterical sarcasm demonstrates your selfishness and failure to join the Revolution. You'd rather cast aspersions at Trump and his supporters, and, in general, not-so-subtly attempt to undermine morale here in this community.
And there you go, bellyaching about your zot again.
You're just going to carry the torch for the poor, misjudged, pledge-breaker Ted Cruz until the bitter end, apparently.
As for your ability to say anything helpful about or complimentary of Donald Trump, you just can't bring yourself to do it. You just can't get on board with the positive vibe.
Instead, you seem tp prefer the role of Tokyo Rose; the veritable voice of "reason" and "sobriety" with respect to incisively analyzing the "disturbing" Trump campaign.
Please give it a rest, sir. Until you can sincerely embrace the Trump campaign, you're just a big killjoy here.
Vote Trump!
You are aware because I have so informed you that I cannot reply to you in private mail because that function has been suspended or, perhaps, terminated. Similarly, I cannot reply to you by public reply because so often those replies disappear into the black hole of censorship. So I am left the position in which you can slander me personally but I cannot effectively reply.
By way of example: in reply to your rather fatuous reply arguing that the recent polls are not to be believed, I offered two citations in separate replies to the averages compiled by Real Clear Politics showing unanimity in polls showing big leads beyond the margin of error in all cases but one by Hillary nationally and in battleground states. These replies were censored and never published yet today we see reference to the very same Real Clear Politics polls all over this forum. I attempted to answer your criticisms of me personally with the reference only to a reputable factual source hoping that that at least would get published here. No joy.
Today you compare me unfavorably to a traitor who was executed for her crime. How might I respond to that? With another factual reference which gets censored away? With a private reply, which is denied me?
Yet you accuse me of bellyaching about being zotted when you're fully aware of the limitations of my ability to reply to your personal slanders of me and you cynically and cravenly exploit the situation.
