[Haiku Guy]

There is a loyalty oath for Naturalization. In it, the prospective citizen must declare, under oath, that he will "support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same."

Sharia law is incompatible with the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.

We should ask anybody entering the country which law should be foremost, Sharia or the Constitution of the United States.

[SecondAmendment]

Didn’t Obama just make the loyalty oath optional?

[ilovesarah2012]

Why wouldn’t they just lie?

We need to block muslims from coming here. Of course, given our porous southern border, not confident that will happen.

[JimRed]

Sharia law is incompatible with the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.

Yet a Muslim can take the oath, because taqiyya requires that they lie to the Infidel for the benefit of Islam.

[FreedomPoster]

It would be a start, but there’s a fundamental problem with the approach. To anyone who really believes in Sharia, lying to an infidel to advance Islam is perfectly acceptable, even laudable.

[rlmorel]

I do believe they did change it.

The problem is, with muslims, the concept of Taqiyya which allows them to lie, cheat, or deceive with no moral ramification if it is necessary or needed to advance the cause of Islam.

So, an oath means nothing anyway.