Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Billionaire LA Rams owner Stan Kroenke tells ... residents in Texas to get off his ... land (edited)
Daily Mail ^ | 8/12/2016 | Kiri Blakeley

Posted on 08/13/2016 10:25:38 AM PDT by RightGeek

Hundreds of Texas residents, many elderly and on fixed incomes, will have to move from the land they've been leasing for decades thanks to a billionaire who bought the land and is forcing everyone off of it.

Los Angeles Rams billionaire owner Stan Kroenke - who also owns north London football team Arsenal - bought up 535,000 acres of legendary ranch land near Lake Diversion outside of Wichita Falls in February, reports Dallas News.

...

The Cara Blanca Park land had been in the Waggoner family, which established the property 164 years ago. The family then leased the land near the northern part of the lake in plots to hundreds of residents, who paid for homes.

...

An eviction notice sent to the residents posted on a GoFundMe account says they must be off the land by January 31, 2017.

Kroenke says he wants to return the land to its original 'natural, uninhabited landscape to support and improve the microecosystem' read the eviction notice.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: billionaires; kroenke; nfl; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

1 posted on 08/13/2016 10:25:38 AM PDT by RightGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Well...they own it. It’s their’s to do with as they please.

Now the only question is whether the leases have expired or not.


2 posted on 08/13/2016 10:28:01 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek
The family then leased the land near the northern part of the lake in plots to hundreds of residents, who paid for homes.

Hope those homes have tires.

3 posted on 08/13/2016 10:28:32 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek
Kroenke says he wants to return the land to its original 'natural, uninhabited landscape to support and improve the microecosystem' read the eviction notice.

What a dumb@$$. Just another rich lib. Nature is more important than people.

4 posted on 08/13/2016 10:29:26 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Cuckservative: a "conservative" willing to raise another country's ideology in his own country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Nature Power is more important than people.

A slight revision...

5 posted on 08/13/2016 10:32:45 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Well, if it’s legal, that’s it. The previous owner could have sought to structure protection for the leaseholders in the sale, but ofc that would have lowered the sale price, if the Kroenke had been willing to consider it at all. Never a good idea to rely upon a lease when putting your own money into a property!!


6 posted on 08/13/2016 10:33:55 AM PDT by Enchante (Hillary's new campaign slogan: "Guilty as hell, free as a bird!! Laws are for peasants!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Unless it was a 99 year lease, why would you build a house on it? Also, while I suspect they haven’t a leg to stand on, would they not be able to squat, having improved the property? They make this guy sound like a mean nasty ogre, and while he may be exactly that, if he bought the land legally then it should be his to do as he pleases.


7 posted on 08/13/2016 10:35:04 AM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

It figures there’d be a Walton in the mix.


8 posted on 08/13/2016 10:35:32 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Trump-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

So? It’s his land. Last time I checked, we still had property rights, though I question for how much longer.


9 posted on 08/13/2016 10:36:19 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

There are no “property rights”.


10 posted on 08/13/2016 10:38:53 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Trump-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Old man Kroenke: “Get off of my [535,000 acre] lawn!”


11 posted on 08/13/2016 10:39:06 AM PDT by AZLiberty (A is no longer A, but a pull-down menu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

I would much rather see eco nazis buy up land they want to protect than to fund politicians to change the law to impose some eco-tyranny fitting w/their religion.


12 posted on 08/13/2016 10:41:13 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

This one will be going to court and I have no idea who might win.

It is possible that the letter sent was sent to try and get everyone to move by intimidation and it might not fly in a Texas court of law. It depends on how the lease was written.

He may end up buying everyone out. Expensive but probably a fully developed plan b.


13 posted on 08/13/2016 10:45:16 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

This one will be going to court and I have no idea who might win.

It is possible that the letter sent was sent to try and get everyone to move by intimidation and it might not fly in a Texas court of law. It depends on how the lease was written.

He may end up buying everyone out. Expensive but probably a fully developed plan b.


14 posted on 08/13/2016 10:47:08 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Don’t build your house on rented land.


15 posted on 08/13/2016 10:53:12 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960

A lot of truth there.


16 posted on 08/13/2016 10:53:28 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Who owns the land? Sounds like the rich guy does. Get off his land.


17 posted on 08/13/2016 10:55:22 AM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

He owns the land and any improvements on it.


18 posted on 08/13/2016 10:59:24 AM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Just because something is legal to do doesn’t mean it is good or beyond critique.

People sometimes can be convinced to view things differently or change their mind.


19 posted on 08/13/2016 11:00:30 AM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar

The nooz says “...hundreds of Texas residents, many elderly and on fixed incomes, will have to move from the land...”. “Fixed income” is a dog whistle for the parasitic takers. Tough cookie. Find another land to squat.


20 posted on 08/13/2016 11:01:51 AM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson