To: rktman
Are smoke screens all that effective these days? I thought they were more of a mid-20th century defensive solution.
3 posted on
08/11/2016 9:32:07 AM PDT by
Mr. Douglas
(Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
To: Mr. Douglas
I suggest they put up some giant mirrors to project the image of the city to a different location.
Either that or cover it in mylar a la David Copperfield so it can't be seen at night.
To: Mr. Douglas
Are smoke screens all that effective these days? I thought they were more of a mid-20th century defensive solution.
Seemed to work against Superman in the latest movie.
14 posted on
08/11/2016 10:04:43 AM PDT by
RandallFlagg
(Vote for your guns!)
To: Mr. Douglas
We test obscurants on a regular basis. They have varying degrees of effectiveness and degrees of hazards. Some of the generators are pretty cool, but they expend consumables at an amazing rate, and all are still subject to wind and weather.
15 posted on
08/11/2016 10:11:21 AM PDT by
antidisestablishment
(If those who defend our freedom do not know liberty, none of us will have either.)
To: Mr. Douglas
"Are smoke screens all that effective these days? I thought they were more of a mid-20th century defensive solution."
If they are talking about making the city dissappear from radar, this is something different than a smoke screen as we understand it ... or this is just sloppy reporting by the media.
24 posted on
08/11/2016 11:10:22 AM PDT by
Truth29
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson