To: Red Steel
This is the most confusing article ever.
The first pic just shows a pretty big wallpaper crowd and 2 rows of audience, and does not say where it was.
The second and third images are a different venue, both shot from a different vantage point, both showing a very small crowd.
What's the point here?
11 posted on
08/08/2016 2:53:19 PM PDT by
867V309
(It's over. It's over now.)
To: 867V309
I don’t get it either. They don’t appear to be the same place.
17 posted on
08/08/2016 2:57:10 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: 867V309
Yes a diffenent venue. I beleive the point here is that the Hill.com used a false and photshopped image. A 171 door count to see poopy pants Hillary. That’s pathetic.
To: 867V309
Also, she is in the first photo, but not the second two. The second two could have been taken an hour before she took the stage.
57 posted on
08/08/2016 3:24:27 PM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obamca loves America)
To: 867V309
What's the point here?Did you even bother to read the article?
70 posted on
08/08/2016 3:32:10 PM PDT by
AmusedBystander
(The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson