Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
If you read their methodology, they go state by state.

It says they draw data state by state. But in none of the results shown in the article does it give a state by state breakdown. Just national.

20 posted on 08/08/2016 10:18:15 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Lower Deck

The point is that they are telling us how they do what they do. Better than the others. How do we know the others aren’t pulling their responses from NY, CA, NJ, MA, etc.?


22 posted on 08/08/2016 10:22:14 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Lower Deck

I don’t want to give the impression that the election is not based on electoral college votes.

However, there is a historic correlation between a national sample and the state samples.

What this poll suggests is that Georgia, Texas, South Carolina, etc. are simply not going for Clinton.

It suggests that Trump has an excellent chance in all the battleground states.


25 posted on 08/08/2016 10:24:33 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson