I agree that, for example, our GOP female pols tend to be RINOs. But so do our GOP male pols!
I think it is only right not to vote for or against a candidate based on gender—but based on individual merit.
Our advancement should be based only on individual merit and contributions and NEVER on group identity. We got that all backasswards these days.
I agree with you - I am not voting against Hillary because she is a woman, but because of all that she stands for politically, culturally, socially, and morally. Any man who stands for the same things as Hillary is also on my Flush list. The only person who comes close to Margaret Thatcher’s brains and political acumen from America is Phyllis Schlaffly - I would have supported her for POTUS, but she chose another way to influence politics. (Obviously her daughter doesn’t get it either.)
Traditional political labels are passé - On one side are the Globalist/NoBorders lying traitors (heavily populated by commies/Dems/SJWs/RINOs) and on the other side are the rest of us who just want to be left alone.