We ought to choose leaders by individuals.
Such Cro Magnum ideas as that women shouldn’t be leaders—whether in business or politics or wherever—based on biology rather than individual merit shamefully discredits the conservative position.
‘Cro magnon’ is a not the accepted way to spelling ‘Biblical’
You can mock, laugh at, and belittle the historical record all you want,
That won’t change the lessons learned by those leaders (generally men) who survived to tell their story, whether it is being told in a religious book or a secular one
You may even think you can win this argument.
You can’t.
Nature has already decreed that you lose.
Are you so vain as to think that just because you’ve bought into a current fad of calling women leaders that nature is going to change her rules to suit you?
One just has to look around to see the devastation, heartache, pain, and broken dreams caused by those who follow that line of thinking.
The broken and unrealized dreams of children born into a leaderless (single mother) households.
The devastation which befalls many companies who decide that somehow those who don’t have the innate leadership qualities can somehow become leads, or supervisors, or department heads.
There is a reason successful countries name men into leadership roles.
The kind of thinking you’re promoting is as silly as deciding that if little boys only play with ‘girl toys’ they will turn out OK.
And it’s more dangerous than the dangerous idea that if ‘we’ only decree it homosexual marriage is equal to the thousands of years of traditional marriage that all will be well.