I do however suspect there is a monster vote out there that is not completely being polled.
Thanks for your opinion it makes really good sense.
That would be for Hillary? (who is a monster)
Not necessarily lots and lots, just something. Calling 50,000 people is a big undertaking. These are supposedly graduate students, so you'd think they would try to have a common "script" to make sure they cover the same points. This isn't one person making 50,000 calls, it is many people. If I was leading this sort of effort, I'd produce some of the evidence - script or list of talking points, summary data on some of those points -- something akin to "show the work" that you may recall from math tests. Just giving the answer is sometimes not enough.
-- I do however suspect there is a monster vote out there that is not completely being polled. --
I think there is. Trump's success is clear evidence of that. Look at the turnout, just the turnout. The press is burning much ammunition at this point, and it is taking a big risk with credibility.
Funny exchange on FoxNews with Gingrich. Melania is the only immigrant you guys are worried about. Hillary surrogate is full of "out of the air" distractions, much to Chris Wallace's relief.
Gingrich says Hillary's "short circuit" response was brilliant. Asked if she lied to Benghazi mothers, "no, short circuit" Asked about 76 meeting as SoS, lied, no, "short circuited." Hillary surrogate response" What about Trump's tax return?
This is the wild card that could change the dynamics of the race in much the same way that the first installment of Wikileaks damaged the DNC.