First, I find this headline to be farcical in the extreme! The most notorious places for vote manipulation are the big cities and leftist enclaves. This year's home for the DNC, Philadelphia, has had outstanding examples of this practice in past elections. Districts with votes that exceed registered voters by 10% or better. Vote tallies with 100% cast for a single candidate - really? So the headline, focusing on the Black vote is irrational!
Next, for all who want to return to mechanical machines? Look at history PLEASE! This kind of voting needs to have every machine accompanied by an incorruptible guard from the time it leaves the warehouse until after the vote is accepted! Said guard must also be impervious to intimidation of all kinds and immovable from the vulnerable spots of the machine. Without the above, voting machines are even easier to manipulate and those polling places where the gangs rule will report late and have just enough votes to overcome!
You are correct that the headline has a “click bait” motive - it was written to get people’s attention, whether it was appropriate in this form of sensationalism.
However, the article (and accompanying links) explains how ANY person of any race, color, demographic, etc can have their vote set as a ratio (independent for each). From 0.001 to 25.00 per a single person’s vote. This is how you can get a 100% from of a lower turnout by boosting the decimal point settings in the GEMS statewide vote tabulation software.
Another trick in the software is you can set the percentages of the final votes as the software will ratio the decimal settings of the voters to get the final candidate(s) end results. It is amazingly flexible in the ingenious ways to cheat.