Posted on 08/04/2016 11:15:30 AM PDT by EarthResearcher333
But then they couldn't manipulate the votes with a few keystrokes.../s
Actually I think the voting process was first corrupted in 2000
So you're saying they can manipulate the votes by 10 % by just changing the decimal point? Now that is corruption on a max level.
First, I find this headline to be farcical in the extreme! The most notorious places for vote manipulation are the big cities and leftist enclaves. This year's home for the DNC, Philadelphia, has had outstanding examples of this practice in past elections. Districts with votes that exceed registered voters by 10% or better. Vote tallies with 100% cast for a single candidate - really? So the headline, focusing on the Black vote is irrational!
Next, for all who want to return to mechanical machines? Look at history PLEASE! This kind of voting needs to have every machine accompanied by an incorruptible guard from the time it leaves the warehouse until after the vote is accepted! Said guard must also be impervious to intimidation of all kinds and immovable from the vulnerable spots of the machine. Without the above, voting machines are even easier to manipulate and those polling places where the gangs rule will report late and have just enough votes to overcome!
You are correct that the headline has a “click bait” motive - it was written to get people’s attention, whether it was appropriate in this form of sensationalism.
However, the article (and accompanying links) explains how ANY person of any race, color, demographic, etc can have their vote set as a ratio (independent for each). From 0.001 to 25.00 per a single person’s vote. This is how you can get a 100% from of a lower turnout by boosting the decimal point settings in the GEMS statewide vote tabulation software.
Another trick in the software is you can set the percentages of the final votes as the software will ratio the decimal settings of the voters to get the final candidate(s) end results. It is amazingly flexible in the ingenious ways to cheat.
Links to referenced research and conclusions (parts 7 & 8 not yet active and their links might change).
Fraction Magic Part 1: Votes are being counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers
http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1
Fraction Magic Part 2: Context, Background, Deeper, Worse
http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-2
Fraction Magic Part 3: Proof of code
http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-3
Fraction Magic Part 4: Presidential race in an entire state switched in four seconds
http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-4
Fraction Magic Part 5: Masters of the Universe
http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-5
Fraction Magic Part 6: Execution Capacity
http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-part-6/
Fraction Magic Part 7: Whodunnit coming
( http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-7 or http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-part-7 )
Fraction Magic Part 8: Solutions and Mitigations coming
( http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-8 or http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-part-8 )
They shouldn’t be using DOUBLE, they should be using UNSIGNED INT (max 4,294,967,295). Not everyone appreciates the difference between integers and floats.
This is just the database table definitions (CREATE TABLE) and table definition changes (ALTER TABLE). There is no “code” that adjusts vote totals based on race.
It looks as though they are keeping track of blank votes (no selections made for any candidate for any position), undervotes (i.e. no selection made for President) and overvotes (i.e. more than one selection made for President), and they’re recording that by race, and summing it, presumably to determine voting competency by race.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.