To: COBOL2Java
At first I thought as many other people did, that if Trump had just left the Khan DNC speech alone and not mentioned it, that there would have been no controversy.
Now I’m beginning to see that the media would have used Khan anyway, whether Trump had responded or not, in this disgusting fashion to hit him on all things military.
Oh, and he should tread lightly on this “draft dodger” thing, or someone in the media might dredge up Bill’s infamous deferment.
18 posted on
08/03/2016 6:03:44 AM PDT by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Democrats: The perfect party for the helpless and stupid, and those who would rule over them.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Now I’m beginning to see that the media would have used Khan anyway, whether Trump had responded or not, in this disgusting fashion to hit him on all things military.
Bingo. Khan is a tool (I use that term in the most demeaning sense). The Hillary! campaign would have used him in this way whether Trump had responded or ignored him.
25 posted on
08/03/2016 6:07:54 AM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(Donald Trump, warts and all, is not a public enemy. The Golems in the GOP are stasis and apathy)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
> “Now I’m beginning to see that the media would have used Khan anyway, whether Trump had responded or not”
Yup. And why it’s necessary for DT to lead counterattacks on Clinton mouthpieces.
103 posted on
08/03/2016 7:22:29 AM PDT by
Hostage
(ARTICLE V)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson