Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheCipher

You do not have to be a lawyer in order to be appointed to the Supreme Court, though it helps.

Now lookee here...are you sayin’ that they don’t even need no edumucation? Hmmmmm. Maybe I’ll try out.


126 posted on 08/04/2016 1:24:04 PM PDT by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: sanjuanbob
Now lookee here...are you sayin’ that they don’t even need no edumucation? Hmmmmm. Maybe I’ll try out.

Actually you don't. She could nominate anybody, and as long as they control the Senate, they would rubber stamp it. I wouldn't be surprised if you saw Justice Chelsea sitting on the court ( after all, there are too many with law backgrounds sitting on the court. We need a "common man" ( correction common WOMAN ) sitting on the court to bring some common sense to the court - Hillary's argument )

127 posted on 08/04/2016 7:48:40 PM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson