His was brand knew too theater plain and simple did he really have a son killed while serving? or is it lie ? or was he a mole and sacrificed ?
Good, I hope people read it.
It’s easy to understand.
Except for Kenyanesians and Cubanadians.
What section in there gives Pakistanis and other species of moslems the right to come to America?
I missed that section I think.
Yep, the Dems are going to regret having people read the Constitution.
Or is it the Constitution as interpreted by Saul Alinsky?
The islamic POS couldn’t care less about our Constitution. His retarded faith in islam and DNC money is all the sand flea needs.
I hope they do read it.
She need not worry.
Her core voter wont understand it if they manage to read the Constitution.
Most of her supporters can’t read.
Unintended consequences.
This may cost Hillary-Billary-Crock more votes as LIVs discover the rule of law.
GO TRUMP!
Everyone wants to find the part that says a president can’t suspend immigration of refugees until they can be vetted.
Wasn’t there a law passed in 1952 covering this.
I don’t know that I like a pakastanian lecturing me on OUR constitution.
Better stock on copies now - if Hillary becomes prez and puts one more lib justice on the Supreme court, the Constitution’s likely to be outlawed in a few years.....
And nowhere in the Constitution does it say that we are required to accept any immigrants or that non citizens of any kind have Constitutional Rights.
How surprised will the leftards be if they actually crack it open and read what is written therein?
I havent had a look at the $1 pocket Constitution. But people need to know the history of the Constitution before its going to do them any good.
More specifically, they need to know the intentions of constitutional lawmakers, key statements in Supreme Court case opinions, and amendments ratified by the states to the Constitution after unpopular Supreme Court decisions.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
Out of all to the people who purchase these handy little pocket Constitutions, it will be easy to tell which ones are flaming liberals, because they either can’t read it, have a seizure if they do read it, or just burst into flames when they flip open the cover.
This is the $1 “Best Seller IN CONSTITUTIONS”. Of course anyone looking for a copy of the Constitution would buy the $1 version. Trying to portray this as a “Best Seller” on Amazon is a little disingenuous. This is just more liberal baloney. If the Muzzie can get the U.S. Constitution on the “Best Seller” non-fiction book list, I’ll be impressed.
They could have gotten one free if they had joined the Tea Party ... years ago and they would have had someone available to help sound out and understand the tough phrases like “shall not be infringed...”!
I get them from time to time from Cato too. I have a short stack of them, one dogeared and marked up.
If Khan ever read the Constitution he should know it does not cover non citizens. Rapefugees have no rights under the Constitution.