Posted on 07/27/2016 1:56:10 PM PDT by proust
Trump is right again. Russia is obligated to help the U.S. in criminal (Hillary) matters. Signed by her husband. Lol
Bill isn't, but Hillary is. She's a moron, and always has been.
She is an excellent example of something called the Dunning–Kruger effect, which is well explained in a Wikipedia article. Here's a quote:
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which relatively unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability to be much higher than it really is.Dunning and Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their own ineptitude and evaluate their own ability accurately.
I am indebted to FReeper coloradan for cluing me in to this concept, which is so relevant to todays world and the many moronic bozos who occupy the attention of the public.
Trump has hired entire teams of lawyers for the past four decades. He’s not going to spout off on legal matters without making a couple of phone calls.
If, as all the Dems say, Russia hacked the servers, would Obama be obligated to request any documents they may have?
bttt
Did their actions with Snowden breach the agreement? <-—That’s a rhetorical question.
When Pres. Reagan said "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" did he need a treaty and a formal request to do so?
Ya think anyone buys that? ☺
Putin called the Snowden aid a “human rights” issue.
Btw, you’re referring to the FBI et al, totally ignoring of warning from the Russians regarding those folks who bombed the Boston Marathon?
Begs the question, should this type of negligence not been subject to a criminal matter/investigation as well?
The Russians sent a warning about the Tsarnaev brothers BEFORE the bombing incident, which was ignored. There was no criminal investigation at the time. Afterward, yes. But not before. The Treaty regarding investigations did not apply before the bombing. That was an exchange of intelligence.
Can it be more clear or do I have to draw some pictures?
My point is that the treaty involving exchange of information on criminal investigations does not require a sua sponte exchange of information. How should the Russians be reasonably expected to know what criminal investigations are taking place in the United States? Such treaties call for a formal request and response. And in these circumstances, there is no way the 0bama regime wants to make that request. It could become the subject of an FOIA request that would implicate 0bama himself. Plausible deniability. We don’t have the Russian e-mails because we never asked. And that suits Putin just fine.
I don’t think you understand international diplomacy very much.
Sigh....
Btw, you’re referring to the FBI et al, totally ignoring of warning from the Russians regarding those folks who bombed the Boston Marathon?
Begs the question, should this type of negligence not been subject to a criminal matter/investigation as well?
LOL!! How ironic!!The noose tightens!!
I think you’re projecting.
Ya mean like the corrupt loser leadership diplomacy and reckless dangerous country looting foreign policies coming out of D.C. for the past 25+ years, right Mr. henkster?
You are conflating 'assisting us with criminal investigations' with 'owning up to a criminal act and returning stolen property.' The treaty you keep referring to has nothing to do with criminal acts committed by the Russian government itself against us.
Bump
I’m tired of talking to you guys. Read the goddamn treaty yourselves. I did. It pretty much provides what I’ve said it does.
https://lettersblogatory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/russia-mlat.pdf
Just a word of warning. They use big words and there are no pictures.
Lets try again.
Regarding the totally ignored Russian warning about the Boston Marathon bombing suspects, should this type of colossal negligence not been subject to a criminal matter/investigation as well?
Oh, by the way, the Russian government and whoever else who has Hillary Clinton’s emails did not steal them from the United States government. Hillary Clinton’s server was not the property of the United States government, and was not part of the official communications system of the United States government, and was in no way authorized for such communications. It was the property of Hillary Clinton. The “crime” committed by Russia (and every other intelligence agency in the world) was not against the United States. It was against Clinton personally.
That’s why her security breach was so bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.