Posted on 07/25/2016 12:45:01 PM PDT by grundle
Thousands of leaked emails have sealed the fate of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz's uneven five-plus-year tenure as DNC chair.
Wasserman Schultz's resignation announcement Sunday afternoon comes as a bad situation just keeps getting worse -- and appears as though it might continue to do so. That's because WikiLeaks has so far released nearly 20,000 emails, new details are still being discovered, and there is still the prospect of additional, damaging emails coming to light.
Many of the most damaging emails suggest the committee was actively trying to undermine Bernie Sanders's presidential campaign. Basically all of these examples came late in the primary -- after Hillary Clinton was clearly headed for victory -- but they belie the national party committee's stated neutrality in the race even at that late stage.
Below is a running list of the most troublesome findings for Wasserman Schultz and her party. As new revelations come out, we'll update it.
1) Targeting Sanders's religion?
On May 5, DNC officials appeared to conspire to raise Sanders's faith as an issue and press on whether he was an atheist -- apparently in hopes of steering religious voters in Kentucky and West Virginia to Clinton. Sanders is Jewish but has previously indicated that he's not religious.
One email from DNC chief financial officer Brad Marshall read: “It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist."
Marshall added in a later email: “It’s these Jesus thing.”
In response, CEO Amy Dacey said: "Amen."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
It’s just impossible for me to understand how any thinking person could ever attach themselves to a Clinton in any way, or even just consider voting for these evil power whores.
Everything and everyone that they’ve EVER touched, and everything and everyone they ever WILL touch, will someday turn to utter and absolute sh*t.
I have ZERO compassion for the Human Colostomy Bags like Wasserman-Schulz, Lynch, Comer, Obama, etc etc etc who attach themselves to the Clintons.
What can those useful crap-depositories expect they’ll gain from allowing themselves to be fouled with the never-ending Clinton stain? They’ve got to know that they’ll one day be unceremoniously detached and discarded into the waste bin, while the Clintons ooze on to the very next filthy and inevitable scandal. Can they not read history? Are they so deluded with grandeur that they just are incapable of knowing how effectively and irrevocably they’re being played? The Clinton Stench is FOREVER.
As it’s been said before, there are only two types of Clinton “friends”: Those who have already been rat-bleeped by the Clintons, and those who WILL be.
Scumbags—no sympathy.
MAPA was supposed to be a bipartisan group to help elect Latinos to office. It became a wing of the Democrat party and part of the Aztlan movement. Seems very shady but they do a good job hiding things.
All day long I’ve looked for someone (FBN, FNC) to mention the media tie in to all this. They only talk about the DNC and Bernie.
bookmark
All day long I’ve looked for someone (FBN, FNC) to mention the media tie in to all this. They only talk about the DNC and Bernie.
_________________________________________
The media tie in is deep.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7722
“...Working with the DSCC, we placed a story in The Washington Post announcing the lawsuit on April 14, and published a Medium post from DNC CEO Amy Dacey on why we were filing suit. The initial roll out generated well over 100 earned media mentions. Among our most prominent placements: CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, U.S. News & World Report, Politico, AP, Reuters, The Guardian, and The Nation...”
“... Draft op-eds for Native American leaders
Draft an op-ed for the Arizona Informant...
Submit an op-ed to Univision.com from our national Hispanic surrogate calling for an immediate need to move the case forward...”
“...Pitch an investigate piece on the modern fight for voting rights to Ebony, the largest African-American magazine”
Many have long suspected that the DNC coordinated with the MSM and outside other groups to push their talking points, but it’s still amazing to see how how deeply coordinated it all actually is (The Washington Post, Univision, MSNBC, Indian American groups, Hispanic groups, social media, etc)
Absolutely. The problem is how many ignorant people buy into it, bad enough they brain wash the Hispanics/Latinos whatever we are calling them this week- but so many "privileged whites" as well.
Liberals have bought this garbage hook line and sinker and have no idea their leaders only promote this garbage to promote votes and money.
Some conservatives have even bought into this drivel, I see posts here occasionally that spin my head.
So true. It is another shady group that needs to be really investigated and we should all keep an eye out for their actions and those of the leadership of that organization.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.