1 posted on
07/22/2016 10:20:52 PM PDT by
proust
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: proust
2 posted on
07/22/2016 10:22:03 PM PDT by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
To: proust
Assange hinted that the emails slated for publication contain additional information about the Clinton Foundation.
3 posted on
07/22/2016 10:22:58 PM PDT by
proust
(Cruz forgot to say "Allah Ackbar" before blowing himself up)
To: proust
They probably have more than enough now.
...but they’re RATs. Why would they.
4 posted on
07/22/2016 10:23:13 PM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Canadians can't be our President.)
To: proust
6 posted on
07/22/2016 10:25:33 PM PDT by
BlessedBeGod
(To restore all things in Christ ~~~~ Appeasing evil is cowardice.)
To: proust
To: proust
Reminds me of Andrew Breitbart about to break a big story right before he got a dart in the back of the neck.
Julian shouldn’t walk in public. In fact, he probably shouldn’t leave the house.
8 posted on
07/22/2016 10:26:15 PM PDT by
Kenny
To: proust
10 posted on
07/22/2016 10:26:44 PM PDT by
vpintheak
(Freedom is not equality; and equality is not freedom!)
To: proust
It would be nice if the release was made AFTER she was officially given the nomination, maybe a week from Monday, so that it could become a major story just as she’s starting to campaign, and provide Trump even more ammunition to use against her.
12 posted on
07/22/2016 10:27:02 PM PDT by
euram
To: proust
13 posted on
07/22/2016 10:27:11 PM PDT by
NRx
(A man of integrity passes his father's civilization to his son, without selling it off to strangers.)
To: proust
NOTHING could indict Hillary. NOTHING, not even evidence that she set Ambassador Stevens up to be kidnapped on behalf of Mohammed Morsi for the return of the Blind Sheik.
14 posted on
07/22/2016 10:27:21 PM PDT by
CivilWarBrewing
(Females DESTROYED America.)
To: proust
oooh ok tonight I can enjoy the dream.... but then Wikileaks had damned well better prove it!
As leftists they really may hate her enough to do it. Hard core leftists truly loathe establishment Democrats, and may think that it’s better to pave the way for Trump and try to provoke a “progressive” reaction going into the future. OR, if they do it right away, they may be thinking that Bernie Sanders can still be substituted on the ticket???
If they have the goods I do hope they unleash them just AFTER the DNC. We don’t want to see the Democrats pull some last-second Hail Mary with a different candidate in Philadelphia if they suddenly decide that Hillary is doomed. Let it wait until she is the official nominee, please.
16 posted on
07/22/2016 10:27:57 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Hillary's new campaign slogan: "Guilty as hell, free as a bird!! Laws are for peasants!")
To: proust
This could be a world full of butt hurt for Hillary... And just when she was so close.
19 posted on
07/22/2016 10:28:53 PM PDT by
Bullish
(That establishment heads from both sides are exploding over Trump is the very best part.)
To: proust
Hill could be spit-roasting small children and still DOJ wouldn’t prosecute her. Just ain’t gonna happen.
21 posted on
07/22/2016 10:29:17 PM PDT by
farming pharmer
(www.sterlingheightsreport.com)
To: proust
She never gets in trouble for anything why would it matter about the emails as if the DOJ will even let anyone see them.
26 posted on
07/22/2016 10:31:26 PM PDT by
funfan
To: proust
Indictment or not, her criminal judgment needs to be exposed as much as possible.
27 posted on
07/22/2016 10:31:39 PM PDT by
period end of story
(Give me a firm spot, and I will move the world.)
To: proust
there seems to be 1000 times enough info and evidence out there to indict her
the problem is not the evidence, the problem is finding an honest prosecutor
meaning, someone outside of the Obama regime....
how ya gonna do that, Wiki?
30 posted on
07/22/2016 10:31:56 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
To: proust
In a recent interview with ITV, Assange said the whistleblowing website will soon be leaking documents that will provide “enough evidence” for the Department of Justice to indict the presumptive Democratic nominee.
“enough evidence”? We and the GLOBALIST FBI already have that. What else you got?
32 posted on
07/22/2016 10:32:04 PM PDT by
867V309
(It's over. It's over now.)
To: proust
It’s hard to catch a weasel. Stay healthy my friend.
35 posted on
07/22/2016 10:33:31 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Let's Make Our Founding Documents Great Again!)
To: proust
To: proust
hillary could sexually assault a 2 year old child and murder him/her on live TV, and it wouldn’t affect her supporters at all.
45 posted on
07/22/2016 10:40:25 PM PDT by
zeugma
(Welcome to the "interesting times" you were warned about.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson