Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Hostage Air Base – and Its Hydrogen Bombs
American Thinker ^ | July 20, 2016 | Stephen D. Bryen and Shoshana Bryen

Posted on 07/20/2016 11:00:58 AM PDT by Kaslin

The United States runs its air operations against ISIS in Iraq from Incirlik Air Base in Turkey. The base, used by other NATO forces as well, is not American. It is Turkish, and the U.S. needs government permission to fly from there. Since the 15 July coup attempt in Ankara, U.S. forces at Incirlik are essentially hostages to the Turkish government. The Turkish base commander and his aides have been arrested; U.S. personnel are confined to base; outside power has been cut off; and while the U.S. has been permitted to resume operations over Iraq and Syria, it is working under adverse conditions, to say the least. Most worrisome, about 50 hydrogen bombs are stored by the U.S. at Incirlik, ostensibly on behalf of NATO. These bombs are "protected" by Turkish troops and to some degree their potential use is shared with the Turkish Air Force.

The deployment goes back more than 50 years, begun as an effort to counter the Soviet military buildup as an offset to quantitatively larger Soviet ground forces facing Europe. But by the mid-1980s the U.S. put more emphasis on "tactical" missiles, largely to counter the Soviet Union's deployment of SS-20's, a short to medium range missile with multiple, independently targeted warheads (MIRV) in the second and third versions of the SS-20. In 1987 the Intermediate and Short-range Missile Nuclear Treaty (INF) was signed and the Russians and the U.S. began removing their missiles. By 1991, all the missiles of concern on both sides were eliminated.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; bho44; bomb; erdogancountercoup; hydrogenbomb; incirlik; incirlikhostage; nationalsecurity; nato; nuclear; threat; turkey; turkeycountercoup; turkeycoup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-145 next last
To: justa-hairyape

I don’t think there is a firm decision, yet. Kerry is playing for time: http://www.breakingnews.ie/world/send-evidence-not-allegations-on-cleric-gulen-john-kerry-tells-turkey-745799.html


61 posted on 07/20/2016 12:11:57 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: pleasenotcalifornia

No.


62 posted on 07/20/2016 12:15:08 PM PDT by Jay Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Turkey already responded to that when they replied, did you need evidence for 911 ?


63 posted on 07/20/2016 12:19:03 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: D Rider

That would be “1000” times more powerful...no?


64 posted on 07/20/2016 12:20:28 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Certain components would be damaged beyond repair, to the point where they would have to be shipped off to a place like Pantex would be my best guess. Keep in mind that these devices are far more engineered than what went off at Trinity so they use a minimum of fissile material. As a result, it takes a lot more precision to achieve criticality. Beyond that I can’t talk about it.


65 posted on 07/20/2016 12:21:00 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It takes 45 minutes to get a nuke to the ME via an ICBM. There is NO REASON to keep nukes in the ME - it’s only a question of time before some ME crazy steals one - or all of ‘em.

Stop the madness - bring all nukes home.


66 posted on 07/20/2016 12:22:11 PM PDT by GOPJ (Diversity was a byproduct of people coming 'yearning to be free', "diversity" was never THE goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; MarchonDC09122009

I was a loader back in the Seventies, and the first time I saw one of those, I was amused...they looked like they were straight out of the Fifties, with those funny fins and streamlined aluminum shape, they just looked like art deco missiles!

They could put them on an A7, and we saw a film of the delivery method where the plane would pull up into a steep climb, and at some point on the upswing, the plane would release the bomb, and then roll onto its back, finally diving to get up speed and get out of the way.

It is a weird way to ‘loft’ a bomb, but apparently they could obtain reasonable accuracy even though it looked there was no way that was possible.


67 posted on 07/20/2016 12:24:51 PM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pleasenotcalifornia

It would not. Those types of weapons cannot go off by accident. There is a specific chain of events that have to occur, and they cannot occur, even if the bomb hits concrete from 50,000 feet.

If there is an attempt to grab those bombs, I would fully expect to see that area carpeted with nuclear weapons tout de suite regardless of who is there, including our own personnel being trapped there.

That would be an awful choice, but I believe it is the one we would have to make.

But as another Freeper pointed out, the people making that choice in our own government have since stopped being “we”, and are something else, if their actions are any indication. So that isn’t a given any more.


68 posted on 07/20/2016 12:33:29 PM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pleasenotcalifornia

No.


69 posted on 07/20/2016 12:36:20 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pleasenotcalifornia

That is not to say if they were blown up, that it wouldn’t make a hell of a dirty radioactive mess, it is just that they wouldn’t all explode in unison the way a conventional ammunition dump would if hit in the right place by another conventional bomb.

Each bomb would have its own conventional explosive payload explode, making each bomb stored there into its own dirty bomb, but that is about it.


70 posted on 07/20/2016 12:37:13 PM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Some of the big ones are, but not these. Others have posted that these are dial a yield bombs. The yield ranges from much smaller to as much as 20 times larger.


71 posted on 07/20/2016 12:39:10 PM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Agreed.

BUMP!


72 posted on 07/20/2016 12:39:21 PM PDT by Chgogal (A woman who votes for Hillary is voting with her vagina and not her brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

“But as another Freeper pointed out, the people making that choice in our own government have since stopped being “we”, and are something else, if their actions are any indication. So that isn’t a given any more.”
~~~~~~
Quite correct.


73 posted on 07/20/2016 12:41:40 PM PDT by Mr. M.J.B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Jay Thomas

Solution? Any?


74 posted on 07/20/2016 12:45:46 PM PDT by Chgogal (A woman who votes for Hillary is voting with her vagina and not her brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jay Thomas

—”I was based in Incirlik in 1980 as a nuclear weapons specialist.”

Given what you know, what would be involved in relocating these Hydrogen bombs?

Is there very much uranium in a Thermonuclear H2 bomb?


75 posted on 07/20/2016 12:48:59 PM PDT by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I verify your account.
A Vietnam War pilot showed us the hairy nuke drop maneuver he had to practice flying his A-6 if need be.
Needless to say he had concerns that he and his co-pilot might not survive the blast after delivery.

RE: “They could put them on an A7, and we saw a film of the delivery method where the plane would pull up into a steep climb, and at some point on the upswing, the plane would release the bomb, and then roll onto its back, finally diving to get up speed and get out of the way.

It is a weird way to ‘loft’ a bomb, but apparently they could obtain reasonable accuracy even though it looked there was no way that was possible.”


76 posted on 07/20/2016 12:50:20 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Get them out, if they are there. The other options get messy.


77 posted on 07/20/2016 12:51:47 PM PDT by Jay Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Jay Thomas
How? SEALs? Delta Force? Air Force Special Ops?

Where do you put them?

Let's face it. Turkey is or is very close to becoming an Islamist State.

78 posted on 07/20/2016 12:55:51 PM PDT by Chgogal (A woman who votes for Hillary is voting with her vagina and not her brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: pleasenotcalifornia

“If Russia were to bomb the vaults holding the B61 weapons would it result in nuclear detonation of those weapons?”
==
From what I know I believe it would take at least an atomic bomb to set off a hydrogen bomb. Someone else could likely confirm or correct me on that, tho.


79 posted on 07/20/2016 12:59:48 PM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

I don’t know about now, but back then we drilled on making the weapons useless. Like I said, it would be very messy.

I would think the same protocol exists today but I have no way of knowing for sure.


80 posted on 07/20/2016 1:03:45 PM PDT by Jay Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson