Skip to comments.
5 injured in crane collapse on Tappan Zee Bridge
Daily News ^
| July 19,2016
| MEG WAGNER
Posted on 07/19/2016 11:27:01 AM PDT by Hojczyk
A construction crane toppled over on the Tappan Zee Bridge Tuesday, injuring five people and creating a "traffic nightmare" over the Hudson River, officials said.
Traffic in both directions came to a halt just after noon Tuesday when a crane working to build the new Tappan Zee due to open in 2018 and replace the current crossing fell onto the existing bridge, according to the New York Thruway Authority.
At least three drivers and two bridge workers were injured, the Journal News reported. None of their injuries are life-threatening.
South Nyack-Grand View Police Chief Brent Newbury told the newspaper he expects a traffic nightmare." Aerial video showed parts of the crane lying across all lanes as lines of cars and trucks sat stopped.
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Jersey; US: New York
KEYWORDS: nyc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
1
posted on
07/19/2016 11:27:01 AM PDT
by
Hojczyk
To: Hojczyk
2
posted on
07/19/2016 11:28:46 AM PDT
by
Hojczyk
To: Hojczyk
3
posted on
07/19/2016 11:30:44 AM PDT
by
Hojczyk
To: Hojczyk
I have managed large, Yuge, construction projects for mining companies all over the world, and I promise, if there is a crane on the job, it will be involved in an accident. The only question is how much damage will it cause?
To: Hojczyk
...and who is the numbnut who decided to build a bridge over the widest part of the river (1956)? AND THEN REPLACE IT! (2016)
5
posted on
07/19/2016 11:38:03 AM PDT
by
Shady
(We are at war again......this time for our lives...)
To: Shady
...who is the numbnut who decided to build a bridge over the widest part of the river...Someone with a brother-in-law who owned a bridge-construction business.
6
posted on
07/19/2016 11:39:55 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Hojczyk
Look for the union label.
7
posted on
07/19/2016 11:40:34 AM PDT
by
soycd
To: Shady
It might be the widest part of the river but it is also one of the shallowest parts of the river. This is the reason they built the bridge there. From an engineering standpoint, it was easier to construct.
I am in that area frequently and I can only imagine the disruption this is causing on I-287 and surrounding roadways. Good thing I won't be anywhere near there today.
The construction site is something to see. Dozens of cranes involved.
8
posted on
07/19/2016 11:44:27 AM PDT
by
SamAdams76
(Did you get pears?)
To: DuncanWaring; Shady
Someone wanting to tap in ze bridge profits.
To: Shady
Apparently it had to do with ingress/egress logistics (towns) on both sides of the Hudson.
10
posted on
07/19/2016 11:48:05 AM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Common sense isn't common any more.)
To: Hojczyk
Lived in Fairfield County (SW) CT for many years. Crossed the Hudson on the Tappan Zee hundreds of times. Tremendous volume of traffic on the bridge pretty much 24/7. The traffic backup will be a major nightmare, no question.
As an aside a barge crashed into the bridge several months ago. If I recall correctly there were casualties.
11
posted on
07/19/2016 11:48:26 AM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: Shady
...and who is the numbnut who decided to build a bridge over the widest part of the river (1956)? AND THEN REPLACE IT! (2016)From Wikepedia:
"The site of the bridge, at the Hudson River's second-widest point, added to construction costs.
The site was chosen to be as close as possible to New York City, while staying out of the 25-mile (40 km) range
of the Port Authority's influence, thus ensuring that revenue from collected tolls would go to the newly created
New York State Thruway Authority, and not the Port Authority."
Politics ... go figure.
12
posted on
07/19/2016 11:50:08 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: SamAdams76
My wife commented from Rockland to White Plaines every day over that bridge for 15 years from 1985-2000. Even back then, the traffic was horrible.
13
posted on
07/19/2016 11:50:29 AM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Common sense isn't common any more.)
To: Shady
...and who is the numbnut who decided to build a bridge over the widest part of the river (1956)? AND THEN REPLACE IT! (2016)It was this guy named Van Winkle.
14
posted on
07/19/2016 11:51:48 AM PDT
by
Stentor
(Free the Rosenbergs--Oh wait. Nevermind.)
To: Cobra64
People will have to divert to the GWB, making that an even more horrendous traffic jam than it normally is.
Or go north to Newbugh Beacon bridge or Bear Mountain.
A huge mess.
To: Cobra64
She was already texting in 1985?
16
posted on
07/19/2016 11:59:58 AM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: Hojczyk
Holy Cow!!! Just crossed that yesterday on the way home from a vacation. We almost stayed an extra day. Glad we didn’t.
To: Shady
New York wanted to build a replacement bridge at a much narrower point a few miles downstream. But it was to have been a single span and it would have cost much, much more than this replacement project.
Putting the new bridge here was, by far, the least expensive option.
18
posted on
07/19/2016 12:04:36 PM PDT
by
Haiku Guy
(The 2nd Amendment immediately follows the 1st because some people are hard of hearing...)
To: BluH2o
Some men on the tug were killed.
19
posted on
07/19/2016 12:06:25 PM PDT
by
Haiku Guy
(The 2nd Amendment immediately follows the 1st because some people are hard of hearing...)
To: FlipWilson
You almost stayed an extra two days.
20
posted on
07/19/2016 12:07:38 PM PDT
by
Haiku Guy
(The 2nd Amendment immediately follows the 1st because some people are hard of hearing...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson