Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MortMan
"...I bought my house to provide an emotional, stable investment for my family...

That's exactly what the elites want to strip away from us - that feeling of safety and comfort.

This article is at it's core, propaganda.

The elites want us all to live in tiny apartments, and accept a far lower standard of living. Our quality of life and lifestyle is a barrier to their agenda.

14 posted on 07/18/2016 5:18:41 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: T-Bone Texan

That’s what I thought. Propaganda.

And you hit on why.

“The elites want us all to live in tiny apartments”

This completely true.


27 posted on 07/18/2016 5:45:42 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: T-Bone Texan
The elites want us all to live in tiny apartments, and accept a far lower standard of living.

It is true that "the elites" are hostile to urban sprawl and automobile-centric planning, and that they favor much denser patterns of urban life. But it is also true that very large cities have passed the point of diminishing returns on far-flung suburbs and brutal commutes. In these areas, the market is increasingly driving gentrification and densification even without the heavy hand of liberal social engineers. The challenge is the recovery, restoration or retrofitting of humanely scaled urban neighborhoods in places that have long been automobile dominated, but in which residents are now rebelling against spending too many of their non-work, waking hours behind the wheel.

The reasonably close-in automobile suburb with a moderate commute is a fine way to live, until it is overtaken by scale. Looking forward, the biggest planning challenge probably falls to the mid-size cities that have not yet hit the commuting wall, and in which road construction still seems like a viable option. These cities need to look around them, and at the colossal transportation mess in places like New York, Philly, DC, Chicago, Atlanta, and anywhere in California. The question is how to avoid a similar fate over the next 50 years, as the U.S. population doubles again and a couple of dozen of today's "mid-majors" come to rival today's Chicago or Atlanta in size.

33 posted on 07/18/2016 6:02:38 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: T-Bone Texan

You are exactly right... they don’t want a rental market of any kind that isn’t 100% run by the government. Cities don’t want rich people who have managed to shelter their money from the greedy hands of local government filling up the cities... they want young dumb tax payers filling the citi


57 posted on 07/18/2016 7:43:31 AM PDT by willyd (I for one welcome our NSA overlords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson