Posted on 07/15/2016 7:59:25 AM PDT by Kaslin
I know one question that was answered very clearly: Does the law apply to everyone equally, or are the elites and well-connected exempt?
After Jon Corzine stole a gigabuck-and-a-half from MF Global with no adverse consequences, it was obvious our masters are exempt.
Queen Hillary has the answer for all these questions.
“Because I am Hillary and I am the Queen!”
How are FBI Director James Comey and a stuffed ferret alike?
They are both gutless weasels.
And so she can get away with it.
I have been puzzled at the timing of events.
In that, we had a year long complicated investigation done by the FBI.
Hillary was interviewed on a Saturday of a holiday weekend.
Comey came out on the following Tuesday morning, the first business day after Hillary’s interview, with his report.
It seems to me the report was already written, and the conclusions already drawn, before Hillary was interviewed by the FBI.
How did they, over a holiday weekend, pull together everything Hillary told them, combined with all other information they had, and produce a report so quickly??
Did lots of FBI workers get paid overtime/holiday pay over that weekend, to produce the report??
Was HIllary’s testimony really important to the final report?
Was the report already written up long before they talked to Hillary??
How the heck does Comey list out all of the shortcomings of Hillary’s email set up, but then conclude that there’s no prosecution warranted???
Many of the powerful and connected have been prosecuted. Just not Hillary. Long ago she made a deal with Satan.
#1 Why is Hillary above the law?
Testifying before Congress, AG Lynch dodged, bobbed, and weaved on a simple question:
Is it illegal to hand off classified materials to someone who does not hold a security clearance?
Demand Congress follow-up using these questions (hat tip SERKIT):
<><>Hillary was allowed to disclose classified data to others not holding security clearances, including her own attorneys and other aids outside the State Department,
<><> Are there documents that Hillary's people were shown that the Congressional Committee is not allowed to see?
<><> Can the Congressional committee see those same documents, un- redacted, as Hillary showed them to others?
<><> Since there was no criminal intent on Hillary's part (according to Comey), and criminal intent is required (according to Comey), what criminal intent would be necessary to show the oversight Committee the same documents?
<><> Why can't the Congressional committee see everything?
<><> What if Hillary gave those documents to the Committee - would that simply be careless....... or would it be criminal?
<><> would Comey give Congress a pass? (hat tip SERKIT)
The other unanswered question: was Comey blackmailed? Threatened? Or just bribed?
A few connected individuals have “political armor” and can’t be touched. Others not so much, but get punished as light as possible. There are also individuals who think they are untouchable; however they often get nailed and become the fall guy.
How many of the destroyed emails involved the Clinton Foundation and fraudulent transactions between State and the foundation as well as pay and play arrangements.
#2 How much does a year long investigation using 150+ agents
that comes to no rational conclusions cost the taxpayer?
...
BINGO! That's what Loretta told Bill on the plane in Phoenix. "Hey Bill, no worries, I told Comey to NOT recommend charges, and I will accept his recommendation." If she thought for 1 second that Comey might recommend charges, she NEVER would have blindly committed to accept his recommendation.
1. Who breached the air-gap between the State Dept SCIF and Hillary’s servers? There is no way to do this without violating the law. There is no way to do this unintentionally.
2. At whose direction? No one would dare do this unless they thought they had political air cover.
3. Are these people to be prosecuted? Of course not. We should be clear at this point in the arc of the Clintons’ reign of corruption how the system works.
4. Why not? A combination of willing cooperation and caution re Arkancide.
1. Was her husband's meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch a quid pro quo event?
2. Was there a gigantic conflict of interest with FBI Director James Comey on the Board of Directors of HSBC Holdings, the corporate parent of HSBC Bank, who has contributed a large sum of money to the Clinton Foundation?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.