They need to ask her about her contact with Clinton and other things going on. There are no doubt people ready to rat on the system. This is war and there is no tomorrow.
They already asked her about her meeting with the ex-perv-in-chief. The Justice Dept. is staffed with loyal Obot drones, so don’t expect anyone there to be blowin’ any whistles.
Absolutely. At a minimum, it gives the appearance of impropriety and horrible judgement on her part. Particularly, when you find out that steps were taken to keep the meeting secret. That, in and of itself, is an admission by the DOJ that the meeting had the appearance of impropriety, if not worse.
Then, the Attorney General needs to be grilled over the gross negligence standard and lack of need for intent in the legislation. She, of all people, should have seen Comey's specious arguments a mile away and realized that he was misapplying the law. Comey, to his credit, laid out a great gross negligence case before he stated wrongly that intent was needed. Get her to admit that interpreting the constitutionality of a statute is not her job nor the job of the FBI director but the job of the courts. If they are concerned about the gross negligence standard in that statute, they have just been handed the perfect case in which to raise that concern to the courts. However, the issue needs to be raised by the Hillary defense team and not the DOJ (although I suppose that they could file a friend of the court brief raising the concerns and in support of the defense's position). The ultimate call, however, lies with the court and her actions did NOTHING to resolve the issue. The statute is unchanged and remains open to the discretion of the future prosecutors and can be arbitrarily applied thanks to her inaction.