Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Yes, this is what I’ve read about these choices. Sessions seems to be the most desirable, but even he is criticized because he doesn’t bring anything to the table, not really forceful enough, etc.

If Christie “evolved” and fully supported Trump’s position on the 2nd A, I have to admit that I like the way he handles the press, and I’d love to see him debate whatever lefty Hitlery chooses. Plus he’d have to have his hugging privileges revoked lol. Newt just spouts off sometimes - you never know what he’s going to do. Other than that, I’ve like him too, except, also, he’s a bit too old.

I didn’t get a good vibe on Flynn, although he sounded great for a posting somewhere. I even liked Michelle Bachmann, but lots of people don’t care for her either. I guess time will tell.


23 posted on 07/12/2016 4:50:03 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: JudyinCanada

Milo and Ann saying they can build a WALL!

26 posted on 07/12/2016 5:12:43 AM PDT by STARLIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: JudyinCanada

Sessions would be a great choice. He is the ultimate conservative. He has been on the right side of every issue. I am thankful that he is on Trumps team.

However, I do think Trump will choose Pence. Pence is youthful. Seems to have a squeaky clean background.
Maybe he can help with surrounding states, Ohio, Michigan....Illinois is hopeless, but Wisconsin?

I guess we wait and see.


37 posted on 07/12/2016 6:16:37 AM PDT by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson