Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man

You are so correct!

Our policy has forever and always been one of retaliation!

The US has never had a first strike policy with strategic assets.

The angle here must be to somehow rewrite history to further demagogue previous presidents and US History, and elevate Obama’s and progressive/socialist stature for the politically correct history books and academics in the future, PERIOD!


62 posted on 07/11/2016 5:09:31 PM PDT by patriotfury (May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: patriotfury

There is a vast difference between being capable of a first strike but having only a retaliatory policy... and not having the capability of a first strike and having only a retaliatory policy.
The capability of launching a successful first strike is the true deterrent to a war, nuclear or not.
Retaliatory threats are only a deterrent to the other guy using a certain class of weapons in his war on us.
It’s the first strike capability, which Cheney warned Saddam we were willing to use should Saddam use certain nonnuclear weapons, which stayed Saddam from ordering the use of chemical weapons against the US in the 1st Gulf War.


79 posted on 01/17/2017 4:21:04 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson