That's a fact, yet several Freepers desperately cling to the Gingrich of 94 who no longer exists.
He's been compromised. That is a fact. Beltway insider. Fact.
The proof has been previously posted on FR over the last 18 years, yet people like you seem to think that he's still the "Conservative Savior" Gingrich of 94.
Who would not vote for Trump because he picked Newt for VP?
I’m not remotely thinking about 94. I want someone that can go from day one, that can deal with the press with confidence, and whomever Hillary puts up, bring in a ton of intellectual heft, and the experience of the legislator. Whipping up crowds is Trump’s thing, and would not be Newt’s.
He is to be the razor attack dong to Trump’s carpet bombing.
There is NOTHING any other of the others “bring” that is remotely close.
Sessions? What is he bringing? Alabama? He isnt a dramatic speaker and isnt media savvy. He is just the “safe” choice on FR to mention.
All of the rest (whom no one here can agree with) are either unknowns or too minor league to get in on day one and MOVE.
They all have things that they have said or done that someone here doesn’t like, so this “100% or lose” BS is a canard at best.