Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MPJackal
If that is not entrapment, what is?

Umm, how about the "alleged" terrorist just says NO?!

Who the F*** side are you on anyway?

Entrapment my ass.

9 posted on 07/06/2016 8:21:52 PM PDT by PROCON (Americans First or Terrorists First - Choose in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: PROCON; MPJackal
MPJackal: They help put the bomb together using FBI fake explosives. They handed him an FBI phone and said dial this number. He did and the fake bomb did what it was supposed to do.......nothing. Then he was charged with trying to detonate a WMD. If that is not entrapment, what is?

PROCON: Umm, how about the "alleged" terrorist just says NO?! Entrapment my ass.

Except the FBI and ATF have been known to infiltrate militias and similar groups and push them into illegal behavior*, like overthrowing government officials or the like. — In this case they're not just egging the guy on, they're actively helping and assisting him. If it isn't entrapment then it is conspiracy, and the agents are party to it and should be prosecuted on "conspiracy to 'detonate a WMD'".

Your special exceptions for government agents being above the law are precisely why Hillary was not indicted.

12 posted on 07/06/2016 9:09:50 PM PDT by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson