[Reno89519]

Pretty damning conclusion, even if no charges: "Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

That should give serious Democrats cause to worry. Do they really want to vote for a candidate who is "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."?

[Paladin2]

Damming conclusion, schmamming conclusion. H->! claims total exoneration, the media agree and we all just Move On.

[Cboldt]

-- Pretty damning conclusion, even if no charges ... Do they really want to vote for a candidate who is "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."? --

Damning or not depends on whether one uses an objective point of view, or a political point of view. No DEM is going to change their vote based on this statement. Not a single one. Comey is going to villified from both sides.

And for those who handle classified material, this wrapup has zero precedential value. Prosecutors have no duty to be consistent. Anybody else (besides our elected and appointend royalty) who did this would be prosecuted.