[uncbob]

With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton's personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence.

In other words it could have been hacked

[Cboldt]

-- In other words it could have been hacked --

Yes. He made of point of saying there was no direct evidence. Well, direct evidence of the sort he describes would be e-mail transmission logs, which customarily are erased after a short time, a couple months at most; or some sort of intrusion log that also showed the transmission of information to a hostile force, and that sort of log would be unusual.

Assume that some foreign/hostile force has the emails. That would not be direct evidence that the foreign/hostile force hacked the private server.