Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bryanw92

Just asking who you mean by “we”. Carter did not side with the Shah.


8 posted on 07/03/2016 1:16:38 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

>>Just asking who you mean by “we”. Carter did not side with the Shah.

WE, the American people. Back in those days, our nation was not so divided that we couldn’t get behind the president, regardless of party, once the election was over. We’d campaign to get them out of office once the next election began (and not two years prior to the actual vote either), but we’d respect the office and go along with the Chief Executive while he was in the office.

My point was that Carter, and the USA, didn’t “side” with anyone because of the nation’s psychological state that I mentioned in the earlier post. We let foreign affairs work themselves out, and that’s a big reason why we became the World Police after Reagan took office.

Being Team America: World Police hasn’t been such a great idea either.


14 posted on 07/03/2016 1:26:35 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson