“And why are Democrats like McAuliffe pushing to restore rights to proven dangers to society (felons)?”
Because when elections in some districts are decided by a few dozen votes he just got an extra 260,000 votes.
>
“And why are Democrats like McAuliffe pushing to restore rights to proven dangers to society (felons)?”
Because when elections in some districts are decided by a few dozen votes he just got an extra 260,000 votes.
>
Maybe, because EX-convicts are called Citizens/Free Men and afforded the same inalienable Rights as the rest of society??
If one is too dangerous to society, they should not be OUT of prison to begin.
We don’t have a tiered-society in this country (OK, if we were still a Republic, we wouldn’t have...we do have ‘protected/special’ classes of people. Still, wholly antithesis to our Constitution).
Now, if you’d wish to argue that those on the public teet vs., say, voting ‘rights’...I’d still point to the anti-(C) ‘laws’ and the 4th/5th/13th.