Why not under oath?
Are you thinking being under oath would have prevented her from lying?
Oh, perjury.
Are you thinking she would ever be charged with that?
Under oath is assumed anytime you talk to the FBI.
...Why not under oath?...
Ita voluntary interview. This was not a criminal trial. A lot of this is just routine, they already have enough evidence to recommend prosecution, or they would not have interviewed her. The FBI realizes she will be saying “I don’t know”, “I don’t recall”, “I’m not sure” to many of their questions, but they have evidence to to answer those questions already. Clinton does not know whether they have been able to recover the deleted emails or not. She does not know what Pagliano has already told the FBI. She is smart to not recall anything they ask her. Saying she does not remember is not lying to the FBI. Her attorney thoroughly briefed her on that aspect. 3 1/2 hours of “I don’t recall” represents a lot of questions that the FBI already knows the answers to. Like I said they already have enough evidence to prosecute her. Why do you think Bill tried to influence Lynch. He realizes they trouble she is in.